Compare

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Anthropic vs Google DeepMind. Specs, benchmarks, and real per-task cost — all in one page.

Verdict

Claude Opus 4.7 leads on LMSYS ELO (1412 vs 1312). Gemini 2.5 Flash is ~57.1× cheaper on a 3:1 input:output blend.

Anthropic

Anthropic’s frontier reasoning model. Leads SWE-Bench and holds top ranks on long-context coding and agentic workflows.

Best-in-class coding agent behaviorStrong instruction following1M-token context with high recallHigh reliability under tool use

Google DeepMind

Google’s price/performance darling. 1M context at $0.30/M input — nobody comes close on throughput-per-dollar.

Absurd cost-to-context ratioFast multimodalFree tier via AI Studio

Pricing

Input / 1M$15.00$0.30

Output / 1M$75.00$1.20

Context1.0M1.0M

Max output64K32K

LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Released2026-03-122026-02-05

Benchmarks

LMSYS ELO1412.01312.0

MMLU Pro92.882.1

HumanEval94.485.8

SWE-Bench72.1—

MATH89.384.2

GPQA66.4—

MMMU79.274.6

IFEval92.186.1

Per-task cost

Summarize a 1-hour meeting transcript$0.263$0.0051

Review a 500-line pull request$0.270$0.0048

Answer a customer support ticket$0.105$0.0019

Extract structured data from a resume$0.150$0.0027

Debug a stack trace with context$0.240$0.0042

Per-call cost using published token counts for each task. Real-world prompts vary.

Add up to four models, tweak tasks live.