Compare
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs DeepSeek R2
Google DeepMind vs DeepSeek. Specs, benchmarks, and real per-task cost — all in one page.
Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Flash is ~1.8× cheaper on a 3:1 input:output blend. DeepSeek R2 is open-weights, the other is proprietary.
Google DeepMind
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle’s price/performance darling. 1M context at $0.30/M input — nobody comes close on throughput-per-dollar.
Absurd cost-to-context ratioFast multimodalFree tier via AI Studio
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R2DeepSeek’s reasoning variant. Competes with o4 on math at a fraction of the cost.
Frontier math at open-weights pricingLong CoT traces
Pricing
Input / 1M$0.30$0.55
Output / 1M$1.20$2.19
Context1.0M128K
Max output32K64K
LicenseProprietaryOpen weights
Released2026-02-052026-01-15
Benchmarks
LMSYS ELO1312.0—
MMLU Pro82.187.8
HumanEval85.890.1
MATH84.294.1
GPQA—71.2
MMMU74.6—
IFEval86.1—
Per-task cost
Summarize a 1-hour meeting transcript$0.0051$0.0093
Review a 500-line pull request$0.0048$0.0088
Answer a customer support ticket$0.0019$0.0034
Extract structured data from a resume$0.0027$0.0049
Debug a stack trace with context$0.0042$0.0077
Per-call cost using published token counts for each task. Real-world prompts vary.