Compare
Llama 4 Behemoth vs Mistral X-Large
Meta vs Mistral. Specs, benchmarks, and real per-task cost — all in one page.
Verdict
Llama 4 Behemoth leads on LMSYS ELO (1342 vs 1318). Mistral X-Large is ~1.3× cheaper on a 3:1 input:output blend.
Meta
Llama 4 BehemothMeta’s open-weights flagship. 405B params, fully open license, runs on every major inference provider.
Best open-weights modelRuns anywhereTransparent training
Mistral
Mistral X-LargeEuropean frontier model. EU-hosted inference, strong European language coverage, Apache-licensed weights.
EU data residencyMultilingual strengthOpen license
Pricing
Input / 1M$2.50$2.00
Output / 1M$8.00$6.00
Context256K256K
Max output16K16K
LicenseOpen weightsOpen weights
Released2025-12-102026-01-28
Benchmarks
LMSYS ELO1342.01318.0
MMLU Pro87.183.5
HumanEval89.388.0
SWE-Bench52.4—
MATH81.578.2
GPQA56.2—
IFEval88.086.5
Per-task cost
Summarize a 1-hour meeting transcript$0.041$0.033
Review a 500-line pull request$0.036$0.028
Answer a customer support ticket$0.014$0.011
Extract structured data from a resume$0.021$0.016
Debug a stack trace with context$0.031$0.024
Per-call cost using published token counts for each task. Real-world prompts vary.