Compare
o4 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
OpenAI vs Google DeepMind. Specs, benchmarks, and real per-task cost — all in one page.
Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Flash is ~50.0× cheaper on a 3:1 input:output blend.
OpenAI
o4Deep-reasoning model. Spends more tokens thinking to crush math, science, and hard coding problems.
State-of-the-art math and scienceExtremely high-ceiling reasoning
Google DeepMind
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle’s price/performance darling. 1M context at $0.30/M input — nobody comes close on throughput-per-dollar.
Absurd cost-to-context ratioFast multimodalFree tier via AI Studio
Pricing
Input / 1M$15.00$0.30
Output / 1M$60.00$1.20
Context200K1.0M
Max output100K32K
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Released2026-02-182026-02-05
Benchmarks
LMSYS ELO—1312.0
MMLU Pro93.882.1
HumanEval92.385.8
SWE-Bench68.0—
MATH96.284.2
GPQA82.5—
MMMU—74.6
IFEval—86.1
Per-task cost
Summarize a 1-hour meeting transcript$0.255$0.0051
Review a 500-line pull request$0.240$0.0048
Answer a customer support ticket$0.093$0.0019
Extract structured data from a resume$0.135$0.0027
Debug a stack trace with context$0.210$0.0042
Per-call cost using published token counts for each task. Real-world prompts vary.